Comments on: How should HR respond to the underutilisation of talent in Australia?

By: Adele

Adele — Fri, 19 May 2023 11:56:30 +0000

In reply to Dawn. Interesting Dawn, because the peer reviewed study data is quite clear that good D&I practises raise every single positive metric, and decreases every single negative metric in organisations. One might say, given the real financial pressures businesses are facing, they can't afford to NOT paid more heed to D&I practises!

By: Becky

Becky — Thu, 18 May 2023 22:28:26 +0000

In reply to Rogi. It's quite strange how you've supported the need for greater DEI initiatives and yet attacked them at the same time. Many of the resources listed address the root cause. I encourage you to explore them in greater depth.

By: Rogi

Rogi — Thu, 18 May 2023 01:03:21 +0000

All those STEM qualified women not in STEM and not one mention of how this is by their choice.
A better analysis is looking at the number of women who start a STEM compared against the number who complete it, compared to the number who then stay in STEM. Dramatic drops at each stage.
Instead of printing another BS piece of DEI nonsense that does nothing to help us, let’s address the root cause and then see if your DEI “solution” is one that will actually help HR help the companies they work for succeed.

By: Malks & Marj

Malks & Marj — Wed, 17 May 2023 10:28:08 +0000

In reply to Sarah. What about this is neo-Marxist, and what's wrong with neo-Marxism?

By: Malks & Marj

Malks & Marj — Wed, 17 May 2023 10:27:17 +0000

This is a great article. We need more women involved at all levels of decision-making.

By: Dawn

Dawn — Wed, 17 May 2023 00:10:40 +0000

Proposing more and more D&I on a business when they are facing real financial pressure is going to go down like a lead balloon.

By: Sarah

Sarah — Tue, 16 May 2023 20:56:03 +0000

Another day, another fluff piece full of neo-Marxist language.